MongoDB, Express, React, and Node all show up pre-installed on Hostinger’s MERN VPS, marketed as a ready-to-build environment for scalable web apps. Testing found real strengths here, near-perfect CPU scaling chief among them, alongside a couple of details on the plan and documentation side that a developer should know about before committing. Here is everything I found.
To score Hostinger’s MERN VPS hosting, I applied HostAdvice’s rating methodology, the same standardized approach used across every review on the site, so scores stay consistent and grounded in real testing rather than marketing claims. Here is how it scored across each parameter.
| Parameter | Score | Why This Score |
|---|---|---|
| Prices | 9.0/10 | Solid 30-day guarantee, though VPS refunds carry a 180-day cooldown and no dedicated free trial exists. |
| Features | 9.2/10 | EPYC hardware, an active malware scanner, and a public API land on every tier as advertised. |
| Performance | 9.3/10 | Near-perfect CPU scaling, strong disk IOPS, and a clean stress test with zero failures. |
| Ease of Use | 8.8/10 | Smooth, fast checkout undercut by a real inconsistency in the plan page’s own bandwidth claims. |
| Support | 9.6/10 | Kodee checked the live server twice and delivered accurate, complete technical fixes both times. |
| Overall | 9.2/10 | A strong MERN host held back mainly by a documentation gap Kodee has to compensate for. |
Hostinger sells MERN hosting as one of four KVM VPS tiers, KVM 1 through KVM 8, each scaling CPU cores, RAM, NVMe disk space, and bandwidth together as you move up.
MERN itself is not a separate purchase, it is a one-click application layered onto whichever tier you pick during checkout, with MongoDB, Express, React, and Node all installed automatically the moment the server is live.
| Name des Angebots | Speicherplatz | CPU | RAM | OS | Preis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVM 1 | 50 GB | 1 Kern | 4 GB | 4,73 € | Details | |
| KVM 2 | 100 GB | 2 Kerne | 8 GB | 6,40 € | Details | |
| KVM 4 | 200 GB | 4 Kerne | 16 GB | 9,46 € | Details | |
| KVM 8 | 400 GB | 8 Kerne | 32 GB | 18,93 € | Details |
A few things worth knowing before you order:
One thing worth flagging directly from testing. The plan page itself lists two different network speed figures in two different places, 1 Gbps in the feature list and 300 Mb/s in the body copy further down.
Real benchmarking during this review lined up with the 1 Gbps claim, so treat the lower figure as an error in the copy rather than the real spec, but it is a detail worth double-checking on the live page before you buy, since marketing pages get updated and this may already be fixed by the time you read this.
A MERN stack puts real demands on every layer of a server at once. Node handles requests on a single thread per process, so CPU speed and how well it scales across cores decides how many concurrent users a Node process, or a cluster of them, can actually serve.
MongoDB reads and writes documents to disk constantly, so disk I/O shapes how fast queries come back. React’s production build gets served as static files, which leans on disk and network together, and Express sits in the middle passing all of it through memory.
I ran a full benchmark suite against the server, CPU, memory, disk, network, and a sustained stress pass, to see what this plan actually delivers, and to settle a bandwidth question the plan page itself could not answer consistently.
The instance I tested was the KVM 4 plan, the one I picked during checkout:
Before the numbers, a word on where this plan sits. Hostinger’s MERN VPS lineup runs the same four tiers as its other VPS products, KVM 1 through KVM 8, and KVM 4 sits second from the top, built for a real application with a meaningful user base rather than a first prototype or a large multi-service platform. What follows reflects that middle-to-upper tier alone.
Single-thread speed is the number that matters most for a single Node process, since Node runs JavaScript on one thread and only spreads across cores if you run it in cluster mode or behind a process manager like PM2 running multiple instances.
At 0.61ms average latency, a single Express process on this server has plenty of headroom before CPU becomes the limit for typical request handling.
The multi-thread result is the standout finding here. Going from one thread to four multiplied throughput by almost exactly four, essentially perfect scaling. That matters directly for Node in particular, since it means running a PM2 cluster with four instances to use all four cores should deliver close to the full four times the throughput of a single process, rather than losing a chunk of that to contention with other tenants on the host, which is the more common outcome on a shared VPS.
The thread fairness figure backs this up too, a variance of about 0.1 percent between threads, tight enough that every core was doing an even share of the work throughout the test.
Both figures sit comfortably in the range current EPYC hardware delivers on this test. For a MERN stack, memory speed matters most where MongoDB keeps frequently accessed data cached in RAM and where Node itself holds objects, session data, and any in-memory caching in the same pool.
At this speed, memory is very unlikely to be the layer that slows a request down. Separately, this instance had no swap configured, so the full 15GB of RAM is what you actually have to work with, no overflow buffer if MongoDB’s working set or a memory leak in a long-running Node process pushes past it.
If you are running a database with a large working set alongside multiple Node processes, watch actual memory usage under real load rather than assuming this tier has headroom you have not confirmed.
Sequential read came in almost twice as fast as sequential write, a real asymmetry worth knowing about if your workload involves writing large files, database backups, uploaded media, log exports, since that side of the disk has noticeably less headroom than the read side.
Random 4K performance is the number that predicts how MongoDB actually behaves under load, since document reads and writes hit disk in small, scattered operations rather than large sequential blocks.
Just under 9,800 IOPS in both directions, evenly matched between read and write, is a strong result for database-style access, and it means MongoDB queries should stay fast even as concurrent connections and document volume grow, well before disk becomes the bottleneck for a typical application.
What does change is how much concurrent load you can throw at that same disk ceiling before queries start queuing, so a busier MongoDB workload benefits from the extra CPU and memory on KVM 4 to process more of those 9,800 IOPS in parallel, not from disk performance itself improving.
This is worth connecting back to the plan page, which listed 1 Gbps network speed in its feature list while separately describing the same plans as running on “a 300 Mb/s infrastructure” in the body copy.
Actual testing lines up with the 1 Gbps claim, not the 300 Mb/s figure, both runs came back close to or above 900 Mbps on upload, and the first run nearly saturated a full gigabit on download. The 300 Mb/s figure on the plan page does not match what this server delivered and looks like outdated or mismatched copy rather than an accurate spec.
The one thing worth flagging directly is that download speed was not identical between the two runs, 983 Mbps on the first attempt against 730 Mbps on the second, a real difference rather than noise.
Upload stayed consistent across both, and packet loss was zero either time, so this reads as ordinary variance in a shared network path rather than a sign of a real problem, but it is enough of a gap that I would not assume every download will hit the full gigabit figure on a given day.
I ran CPU, memory, and disk stressors for 180 seconds each to see how the server holds up under sustained load rather than a quick burst:
Every stressor completed cleanly, zero failed workers and zero untrustworthy metrics across all three, run back to back for a total of nine minutes of sustained pressure.
That is the result that actually matters for a Node application expecting a real traffic spike, a launch, a viral post, a batch job kicking off, since it confirms the server holds together under CPU, memory, and disk all under strain simultaneously rather than degrading unpredictably.
If your traffic actually comes in spikes, a launch day, a marketing push, a batch import running while users are active, that reliability under combined load matters more than any single number above, and it is a reason to lean toward this tier or higher rather than the cheapest option that only looks fine in quiet conditions.
This KVM 4 plan performs well across the board, and the standout result is CPU scaling that came in close to perfectly linear across four cores, which matters directly for running Node in cluster mode to use the full server.
Memory and random disk IOPS are both strong enough to keep MongoDB and Express responsive under real load, and the stress test held up cleanly with zero failures.
Network testing resolved the plan page’s own contradiction in Hostinger’s favor, the real numbers support the 1 Gbps claim rather than the lower figure buried in the body copy, though download speed did vary meaningfully between two test runs and is worth treating as a range rather than a fixed guarantee.
As with any tier in this lineup, these numbers describe KVM 4 alone, not the MERN hosting line as a whole. A smaller side project would likely be fine a tier or two down, while a MERN application expecting to scale past a single Node process should treat this plan’s near-perfect CPU scaling as a genuine reason to consider it over a cheaper tier, not just extra headroom going unused.
I tested Hostinger’s MERN VPS from checkout through exploring the actual server management tools that come with it. That covered picking a plan and location, creating an account, paying, and then working through what hPanel actually gives you once MongoDB, Express, React, and Node are all sitting on the same box.
What follows is what that process was actually like, including one detail on the plan page that contradicts itself before you even reach checkout.
The MERN VPS landing page leads with three claims, free automatic weekly backups, a malware scanner, and the Kodee AI assistant, all included at no extra cost.
Scrolling further down the same page turned up something worth flagging before checkout even starts. The feature list near the top advertises 1 Gbps network speed, but the body copy further down describes the same plans as running on “a 300 Mb/s infrastructure.”
That’s not a small rounding difference, one number is more than three times the other, and it is worth checking against the real benchmark numbers later in this review rather than taking either figure at face value.
I picked the KVM 4 plan and moved into the cart, which laid out the same three choices as always:
In the cart, I went with 24 months for the lower rate, then compared regions directly rather than trusting a default. United Kingdom came back as the best match at 163ms, well ahead of the United States at 254ms.
Scrolling into the application marketplace, MERN Stack was already selected, sitting among the same one-click options I have seen on other Hostinger VPS products, Docker and Traefik, Dify, Hermes Agent, and others.
I then clicked “Continue.” The next step is registration. You can either sign up or log in.
I was already logged into an existing account, so registration was a single click, and the billing and payment screen offered the usual spread:
I submitted payment, got a confirmation email within seconds, and landed back in hPanel with the new server already listed as running.
What stood out here is not the checkout flow itself, which by now behaves exactly as expected across every Hostinger VPS product I have tested.
It’s that conflicting bandwidth claim sitting on the plan page before you have even picked a region. A reader comparing hosts on network speed alone could walk away with two different numbers depending on which part of the same page they read.
After purchase, I was directed to hPanel and used the details I used to register to log into my account.
hPanel opened on its home screen right after payment, the same account-wide panel covering domains, email, the website builder, and every VPS on the account from one place.
It greeted me by name, with an AI prompt bar, shortcut buttons, a to-do checklist, and a running list of every property on the account further down the page.
Scrolling to the VPS table, the new server sat already marked Running, hostname, IP address, plan, and expiration date all visible without clicking anything. I clicked Manage to move into the server-specific panel.
What continues to work well here is how little there is to hunt for. The server shows up on the account home page the moment payment clears, and getting from that listing to server-level controls takes one click, not a search through menus.
Next I wanted to see what actually came with the stack itself, so I opened the VPS Overview page.
The VPS Overview page opened on an app card reading “MERN Stack (MongoDB, ExpressJS, ReactJS, NodeJS),” built on Ubuntu 24.04, with a Manage App button and a separate info banner offering a “Learn more” link out to Hostinger’s documentation for the stack.
Below that sat the familiar server card, Ubuntu 24.04 running on KVM 4, reboot and terminal controls, root SSH details, and the standard note that resource graphs were still populating since the server had only just been provisioned.
Further down the page:
That last line is a real point in this product’s favor. Unlike the malware scanner claim on the plan page, which is easy to take on faith, this one was switched on and already working, 15 files scanned, zero compromised, zero malicious, the moment I checked.
That is the plan page’s promise actually matching what showed up on the server.
Digging into OS & Panel turned up a second copy of the same stack information, a “Current Application” section describing MERN in more detail, with its own “Quick start guide” link separate from the “Learn more” link on the Overview card.
Both point toward getting oriented with the stack, and having two entry points to similar documentation in two different places is mildly redundant, though neither is hard to find.
The same page also doubles as a full OS reinstall picker, AlmaLinux, Debian, Rocky Linux, Ubuntu, Alpine, Arch, CentOS, CloudLinux, Fedora, Kali, NixOS, and openSUSE all sitting there as one-click alternatives if you ever want to wipe the MERN setup and start over on a bare OS instead.
Settings held the same server-level tools I have found consistent across every Hostinger VPS product, a root password generator, one-click resets for firewall and SSH configuration, a hostname changer, and a log cleanup tool.
None of that is MERN-specific, it manages the server underneath the stack rather than the applications sitting on top of it.
For anyone reaching this same point and wondering what to click next, here is the practical path. The Terminal button on the Ubuntu card is the direct route in, it opens a live, already-authenticated SSH session inside the browser, which is where you would actually start working with the MERN files sitting on the server, running Node, checking on MongoDB, or pulling your own code in over Git.
What I thought about server management: The malware scanner being active out of the box is the strongest point in this whole section, a feature that actually matches what the plan page promised rather than sitting there unconfigured.
The OS reinstall picker is a real safety net too, twelve operating systems sitting one click away if the MERN template ever stops being what you need.
My one gripe is the documentation duplication, the Overview card’s “Learn more” link and the OS & Panel page’s “Quick start guide” both point at getting oriented with the same stack, and having two separate doors to what is likely the same content adds a small amount of friction to something that should be a single, obvious path.
Checkout and the path from payment to a running server continue to work well, and the location comparison tool is worth using directly rather than trusting the plan page’s own “recommended” widget, which was not functioning when I tested it.
Once inside the server, the malware scanner is the standout result here, active and already producing real scan data rather than sitting switched off behind a marketing claim.
The rough edge sits earlier in the funnel rather than inside the panel itself, the plan page’s conflicting bandwidth figures are the kind of detail that should never have shipped inconsistently, and it is worth resolving against real numbers before trusting either one.
Kodee, Hostinger’s AI assistant, is the front line here, and a human escalation option sits behind it if you ever need to hand a conversation off to a person.
I never reached for that option during testing, which says something on its own, but it is worth knowing it exists if a question ever goes beyond what the AI can resolve.
I put Kodee through a two-part technical exchange about how Node actually behaves on this server, then went through Hostinger’s knowledge base separately to see how much of that ground it covers without needing to ask anyone.
I opened with a real production question. Whether the Node process backing this MERN app survives closing an SSH session or a server reboot, and whether the Express server the template ships with runs on a fixed port.
Kodee answered directly:
That last point is not something I asked about, and it is the kind of detail that separates a correct answer from a complete one.
I pushed further with a follow-up on that exact point, was Nginx actually installed and configured for HTTPS on this VPS, or would I need to set it up myself. Kodee said it would check the server directly, and it did:
Every one of those is a live fact about my specific server, not a generic Nginx explainer. From there it gave a complete, sequenced setup. DNS records, starting the Node app privately on 127.0.0.1 rather than exposing it publicly, a full Nginx reverse proxy config block, installing Certbot and issuing the certificate, and a verification step at the end covering Nginx, PM2, and a live HTTPS check.
It also flagged not to enable the firewall until SSH, HTTP, and HTTPS were explicitly allowed, and to keep the backend port private once Nginx was handling public traffic.
What I thought about AI support: This is the most accurate exchange I have had with Kodee across two full technical questions. It checked the real state of the server both times rather than assuming, corrected itself into specifics when I pushed on a vague point, and every command it gave matched what it had just found rather than a generic template pasted in regardless of the situation.
The unprompted security notes, twice, are what pushed this from a good answer to a dependably trustworthy one.
Hostinger’s knowledge base is organized into the same set of category tiles I have found consistent across every product, each showing an article count so you can judge how deep a topic goes before clicking in. VPS sits at 275 articles, the largest category by far, with hPanel, Website, and Domains rounding out the next tier down. That structure holds up fine at a glance, but a big category count says nothing about coverage for one specific stack sitting inside it, which is exactly what I wanted to check next.
I wanted to know what Hostinger actually has written for MERN on its own, so I went to the search bar and typed “MERN.” That search came back empty, “No results found for: MERN,” with zero articles matching the term at all.
Searching “MEAN” instead, one letter different, returned 186 results. The top one, “How to use the MEAN Stack VPS template at Hostinger,” is the closest thing Hostinger has to documentation for this kind of stack, but MEAN is not MERN, it swaps React for Angular.
Past that first result, the rest of the 186 matches were noise, articles on TikTok Shop product listings, spam prevention, Registro.br domain errors, and Agency Directory leads all surfaced simply because they contain the word “mean” somewhere in ordinary sentences.
I decided to open the MEAN article anyway to see how good it actually is, since it was the nearest thing available.
The article states upfront that the Mean Stack VPS template comes with PM2, Certbot, and Nginx pre-installed, and that /root/application is pre-created with Express and Angular already sitting inside it.
Reading further, though, Step 1 has you mkdir a brand new project directory and Step 2 has you run npm init and manually write a fresh server.js file from scratch, which sits oddly against the opening claim that Express was already there waiting.
The rest of the guide is Angular through and through, ng new, ng serve, ng build, and it closes by telling the reader they can “expand and enhance” the application later by adding MongoDB, meaning the guide never actually demonstrates connecting the database at all, despite Mongo being the first letter in MEAN.
What I thought about the knowledge base: There is no MERN-specific article anywhere in Hostinger’s documentation, and the nearest match is written for a different frontend technology entirely, with an internal inconsistency about what is pre-installed versus what the steps actually have you build, and a MongoDB section that never shows up despite the stack’s own name promising it.
That gap matters more here than it did testing other stacks, since MongoDB, Express, React, and Node each have their own setup quirks that a MEAN guide simply will not cover. Anyone searching the knowledge base for help with this exact product will come up empty and need to lean on Kodee instead.
Kodee is doing all the real work for this product, and it earns that position. Both technical exchanges involved checking the live server before answering, and the second one caught a real, useful gap, an unconfigured HTTPS setup, that a reader could easily miss until their app is already live and insecure.
The knowledge base, by contrast, has nothing built for MERN at all, and the one article that comes closest is written for a different stack.
A human agent is one click away if a question outgrows what Kodee can handle, but across this testing, that need never came up.
Yes. The infrastructure here is strong, MongoDB, Express, React, and Node all arrive working out of the box, CPU scaling across cores came in close to perfectly linear, and the malware scanner was active without needing to be switched on manually. Kodee backed all of that up with two technical exchanges that involved checking my actual server rather than reciting generic advice.
The gap sits in documentation. Hostinger has nothing written for MERN, and the nearest match in its knowledge base is built for a different frontend technology entirely. That is not a dealbreaker given how well Kodee performed in testing, but it does mean this product leans harder on AI support than a stack with its own dedicated guide would need to.
For a developer comfortable working from AI-assisted answers rather than a step-by-step article, this is an easy recommendation on infrastructure alone. For someone who wants to follow official written documentation start to finish, budget time to lean on Kodee for the parts the knowledge base does not cover.
Yes. MongoDB, Express, React, and Node all come pre-installed the moment the VPS is provisioned, the underlying hardware scales well across CPU cores, and Hostinger’s Kodee AI assistant gives accurate, server-aware answers to real configuration questions. The main gap is a lack of written documentation built for this exact stack.
Yes. MERN Stack is offered as a one-click application during VPS checkout and installs automatically on Ubuntu, with all four components ready to use once the server finishes provisioning.
No dedicated free trial exists for MERN VPS plans. Hostinger backs every VPS tier with a 30-day money-back guarantee instead, though a second VPS refund within 180 days of the first will not be approved.
Yes, within 30 days of purchase, as long as you have not already refunded a different VPS plan in the past 180 days. Upgrades to an existing VPS plan and payments made through cryptocurrency are excluded from refunds entirely.
No dedicated MERN article exists. Searching Hostinger’s knowledge base for MERN returns no results, and the closest match is a guide written for the MEAN stack, which uses Angular instead of React. For MERN setup questions, Hostinger’s Kodee AI assistant is the more reliable resource.
| Description | Expert Review |
|---|---|
| Kostengünstiges Hosting mit hoher Leistung und einfachen Verwaltungstools. | Read Shared Hosting Review |
| Schnelles und sicheres WordPress-Hosting mit Ein-Klick-Installation und Premium-Funkt... | Read Wordpress Hosting Review |
| Skalierbares VPS-Hosting mit dedizierten Ressourcen und Root-Zugriff. | Read VPS Review |
| Schnelles, flexibles Cloud-Hosting mit exzellenter Verfügbarkeit und skalierbaren Re... | Read Cloud Hosting Review |
| Sichere und private Hosting-Lösungen mit Offshore-Rechenzentrumsstandorten. | Read Offshore Hosting Review |
| Sicheres und zuverlässiges E-Mail-Hosting mit professionellen Funktionen. | Read Email Hosting Review |
| Zuverlässiges Python-Hosting mit flexiblen Umgebungen für Entwickler. | Read Python Hosting Review |
| Hochleistungs-PHP-Hosting mit voller Unterstützung für dynamische Websites und Anwe... | Read PHP Hosting Review |
| Zuverlässiges Windows-VPS-Hosting mit voller Kontrolle und Anpassungsoptionen. | Read Windows VPS Review |
| Schnelles und flexibles Hosting, zugeschnitten auf Node.js-Anwendungen mit optimaler ... | Read Nodejs Hosting Review |
| Optimiertes Hosting für WooCommerce-Shops mit hoher Geschwindigkeit und sicherer Int... | Read Woocommerce Hosting Review |
| Dediziertes Server-Hosting für nahtlose Minecraft-Spielerlebnisse. | Read Minecraft Server Hosting Review |
| Skalierbare Hosting-Lösungen mit erweiterten Funktionen für Digitalagenturen und En... | Read Agency Hosting Review |
| Schnelles, sicheres Hosting, optimiert für Magento-E-Commerce-Websites. | Read Magento Hosting Review |
| Leistungsstarkes, Linux-basiertes Hosting für einen stabilen und sicheren Website-Be... | Read Linux Hosting Review |
| Robuste Java-Hosting-Lösungen für dynamische Webanwendungen und Projekte. | Read Java Hosting Review |
| Optimiertes Hosting für E-Commerce-Websites mit sicherer, schneller und zuverlässig... | Read Ecommerce Hosting Review |
| Zuverlässiges Django-Hosting mit hoher Geschwindigkeit und sicherer Umgebung. | Read Django Hosting Review |
| Benutzerfreundliches cPanel-Hosting mit robuster Leistung und zuverlässigem Support. | Read Cpanel Hosting Review |
| Leistungsstarkes Hosting für Unternehmen mit schnellen Geschwindigkeiten, Sicherheit... | Read Business Hosting Review |
| Easy-to-use website builder with drag-and-drop tools and customizable templates. | Read Website Builder Review |
| Optimized hosting for Joomla sites with one-click installation and reliable performan... | Read Joomla Hosting Review |
| Powerful hosting with full PostgreSQL database support for data-driven applications. | Read PostgreSQL Hosting Review |
| Flexible hosting with MongoDB integration for scalable, modern web applications. | Read MongoDB Hosting Review |
| AI-powered website creation platform for building professional sites in minutes. | Read Horizons Review |
| Reliable hosting for n8n workflow automation with easy setup and management. | Read n8n Hosting Review |
| VPS hosting with Docker support for containerized application deployment and scaling. | Read Docker VPS Review |
| Dedizierter SMTP-Server-Hosting für zuverlässige und sichere E-Mail-Zustellung. | Read SMTP Server Review |
| Schnelles und optimiertes Hosting, zugeschnitten auf Ruby-on-Rails-Webanwendungen. | Read Ruby on Rails Review |
| Funktionsreiches Hosting mit OpenClaw-Integration zum Erstellen und Verwalten von Gre... | Read OpenClaw Review |
| Schnelles und zuverlässiges Hosting mit Servern in Großbritannien für optimale lok... | Read UK Hosting Review |
| Erschwingliches und zuverlässiges Hosting mit in Indien ansässigen Servern für lat... | Read India Review |
| Read Singapore Review | |
| Read Australia Review | |
| Read AI Agent Review | |
| Read Paperclip VPS Review | |
| Read Hermes Agent Review | |
| Read Hostinger Connector Review | |
| Read Web Apps Hosting Review | |
| Read Hostinger Reach Review | |
| Read MCP Review | |
| Read hpanel Review | |
| Read Odoo Review | |
| Read Laravel Review | |
| Read Ubuntu Review | |
| Read Drupal Hosting Review |
Yes. MongoDB, Express, React, and Node all come pre-installed the moment the VPS is provisioned, the underlying hardware scales well across CPU cores, and Hostinger’s Kodee AI assistant gives accurate, server-aware answers to real configuration questions. The main gap is a lack of written documentation built for this exact stack.
Yes. MERN Stack is offered as a one-click application during VPS checkout and installs automatically on Ubuntu, with all four components ready to use once the server finishes provisioning.
No dedicated free trial exists for MERN VPS plans. Hostinger backs every VPS tier with a 30-day money-back guarantee instead, though a second VPS refund within 180 days of the first will not be approved.
Yes, within 30 days of purchase, as long as you have not already refunded a different VPS plan in the past 180 days. Upgrades to an existing VPS plan and payments made through cryptocurrency are excluded from refunds entirely.
No dedicated MERN article exists. Searching Hostinger’s knowledge base for MERN returns no results, and the closest match is a guide written for the MEAN stack, which uses Angular instead of React. For MERN setup questions, Hostinger’s Kodee AI assistant is the more reliable resource.
Beantworten Sie ein paar einfache Fragen und finden Sie die perfekte Lösung für Sie!
Hosting-Suche starten
HostAdvice.com bietet professionelle Web-Hosting Bewertungen, die völlig unabhängig von irgendwelchen Unternehmen sind. Unsere Bewertungen sind unvoreingenommen, ehrlich, und es gelten für alle die gleichen Bedingungen.
Wir erhalten eine finanzielle Entschädigung von den Unternehmen, die wir bewerten. Etwaige Entschädigungen und Vergütungen haben keinen Einfluss auf die Richtung oder Schlussfolgerung unserer Bewertungen. Auch beeinflusst eine Vergütung nicht das von uns errechnete Ranking für ein bestimmtes Host-Unternehmen.
Diese Vergütung deckt die Kosten für die Tantiemen der Bewerter, den Kauf der Konten, und das Testen ab.
